Abstract

Modern economic development is accompanied by the structural transformation from an agrarian to an industrial economy. Since the 18th century, all countries that industrialized successfully have followed their comparative advantages and leveraged the latecomer advantage, including emerging market economies such as the People's Republic of China (PRC), India, and Indonesia. The current view is that Chinese dominance in manufacturing hinders poor countries from developing similar industries. We argue that rising labor cost is causing the PRC to graduate from labor-intensive to more capital-intensive and technology-intensive industries. This will result in the relocation of low-skill manufacturing jobs to other low-wage countries. This process, which we call the “leading dragon phenomenon,” offers an unprecedented opportunity to low-income countries. Such economies can seize this opportunity by attracting the rising outward foreign direct investment flowing from Brazil, the PRC, India, and Indonesia into the manufacturing sectors. All low-income countries can compete for the jobs spillover from the PRC and other emerging economies, but the winner must implement credible economic development strategies that are consistent with its comparative advantage.

Highlights

  • Many developing economies have tried to catch up with industrialized countries but only a handful of countries, mostly in East Asia, have succeeded

  • The People’s Republic of China (PRC)’s success over the past 3 decades is the result of a two-pillar strategy: (i) adopting a dual-track approach to reforms, giving transitory protection to comparative advantage defying (CAD) capital-intensive sectors, and liberalizing entry to CAF labor-intensive sectors, thereby achieving stability and dynamic transformation simultaneously; and (ii) as a latecomer, choosing an economic development strategy that tapped into the potential advantage of backwardness along the lines of the flying geese pattern

  • The PRC is at a stage where the western countries and Japan had been during the 1970s and where other Asian economies (Hong Kong, China; the Republic of Korea; Singapore; and Taipei,China) found themselves in during the 1980s

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many developing economies have tried to catch up with industrialized countries but only a handful of countries, mostly in East Asia, have succeeded. As the PRC upgrades its labor-intensive industries and cedes market shares, millions of labor-intensive jobs will be relocated to low-wage countries and can accelerate their industrialization. This process, which we call the “leading dragon phenomenon,” offers an unprecedented opportunity to low-income countries. If other emerging market countries such as Brazil, India, and Indonesia follow the PRC’s growth trajectory, they will create even more labor-intensive jobs in low-income countries.

Catch-up in a Multipolar World
54 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Structural Transformation and Catch-up
Japan’s Catch-up in the Meiji Period
Post-WWII Era
80 Services
The Flying Geese Pattern in East Asia
The Republic of Korea—An Example of Successful Industrial Upgrading7
TexƟles
Import Substitution in the 1950s–1970s
The PRC as a Follower
Sub-Saharan Africa—Trailing Far Behind
The Phenomenon of Relocating Manufacturing Jobs is Not New
Significant Changes in Employment Patterns and Location
Significant Potential for Relocation of Jobs to Low-Wage Countries
Findings
Summary and Implications

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.