Abstract

AbstractIn this study, we investigate a key question of ethical leadership theory: Are ethical leaders able to gain followers' openness to their ethical influence? When describing ethical leadership, we distinguish between leaders’ moral person behavior (i.e., behaviors that are normatively appropriate) and moral management (i.e., using position power to reinforce ethical standards). We then draw on mechanisms of social learning and social exchange and test a moderated mediation model. It is predicted that the effect of leaders' moral person behavior on followers’ openness to ethical influence is mediated by leader‐follower ethical value congruence. Moreover, we examine whether moral management amplifies the effects of moral person behavior. For hypothesis testing, existing measures from the literature are integrated to operationalize four underlying normative reference points of leaders' moral person behavior: humane, justice, responsibility/sustainability, and moderation orientation. After establishing the psychometric properties of this integrative measure, the main hypotheses are tested in two separate studies. While results showed a positive effect of leaders' moral person behavior on followers' openness to ethical influence through ethical value congruence, the moderating effect of moral management was, contrary to our expectation, negative. With this, our study contributes to a better understanding of the mechanisms of ethical leadership.

Highlights

  • Failures in ethical leadership have consistently been identified as an important account of corporate scandals and misbehavior in organizations (Knights & O'Leary, 2005)

  • 4 It is important to note that in this equation, the direct effect of moral person behavior on both ethical value congruence and openness for ethical influence is conditional

  • The same applies to the direct effects of the moderator variable on the outcomes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Failures in ethical leadership have consistently been identified as an important account of corporate scandals and misbehavior in organizations (Knights & O'Leary, 2005). One of the most influential conceptualizations of ethical leadership has defined it as “the demonstration of normatively appropriate conduct (...). The promotion of such conduct to followers” An important tenet of this approach is that ethical leadership represents a composite of being a moral person and being a moral manager (Trevino, Laura, & Brown, 2000). While being a moral person refers to visible traits and behaviors of leaders that are normatively appropriate, being a moral manager describes leaders' proactive efforts to urge followers into an ethical direction. By drawing on social learning theory (Bandura, 1986), it is thought that ethical leaders elicit ethical values, attitudes, and behaviors among followers by modeling ethical behavior (i.e., being a moral person) and proactively pushing ethical standards through

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call