Abstract
Corporate Governance gained prominence in Malaysia during the Asian financial crisis of 1997, which operated as a wake up call that the existing corporate governance structures in public listed companies were insufficient. In response, Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange issued the Listing Requirements on 22 January 2001 to regain investors’ confidence and attract foreign direct investments. The Listing Requirements included a Code of Best Practices in Corporate Governance that favours the leadership structure of separate Chairman/Chief Executive Officer posts. Malaysia is a multi-racial country comprising predominantly of the indigenous Malays, the Chinese and the Indians. The Chinese in Malaysia continue to play a significant role in the economy. These Chinese practise a distinctive Chinese business culture in the running of their businesses. The literature reveals that the adoption of the prescribed leadership structure of separating the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer positions is not likely to improve the financial performance of Chinese controlled companies. An empirical research is conducted, using 218 Chinese controlled public listed companies in Malaysia. The data covered three years from 2001 to 2003. Financial performances of the companies were measured using return on equity, earnings per share, dividend per share, liquid asset per share and gross margin. t-test and Mann Whitney test were used. The results show that there has been widespread adoption of the leadership structure recommended under the Code by the sample companies. The results also show that adoption of the prescribed leadership structure under the Code has no significant impact on the financial performance of the sample companies.
Highlights
There were already some measures of corporate governance in Malaysia before the 1997 Asian crisis
Throughout the three years 2001 to 2003, there is no significant difference in the association between the separation of chairman/Chief Executive Officer (CEO) posts and the five financial measures (ROE, earnings per share (EPS), dividend per share (DPS), liquid asset/share (LAS) and gross margin (GM)) in Chinese controlled public listed companies in Malaysia
The Code of Best Practices in Corporate Governance prescribes a leadership structure that favours the separation of chairman/CEO posts
Summary
The results show that there has been widespread adoption of the leadership structure recommended under the Code of Best Practices in Corporate Governance by Chinese controlled public listed companies. Most of these companies have adopted the separate-titles leadership structure prescribed in the Code. The results of the study find no association between separate-titles leadership structure and financial performance of Chinese controlled public listed companies in Malaysia. The prescribed leadership structure in the Code is likely to play a significant role in the accountability aspect of corporate governance, rather than the business prosperity aspect. Perhaps the more appropriate link is that improved accountability in the company will prevent wealth reduction through abuses by management
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Business Systems, Governance and Ethics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.