Abstract

Soil washing is one of several technologies for the removal of lead (Pb) from soil. Recent studies have focused on washing efficiency using artificially contaminated soils; however, data may not reflect the efficiency of Pb removal for aged, field-contaminated soils. A Glynwood silty clay loam, a river sediment and a sand were artificially contaminated with PbSO4. These, and soil material from a battery recycling/smelting Superfund site, were washed in batch tests with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylic acid (PDA) (0.0225 M, 0.0375 M, and 0.075 M) or hydrochloric acid (HCl) (0.1 and 1.0 N). Using a sequential extraction procedure, 96% or more of the Pb in the artificially contaminated soils and 65% of the Pb in the Superfund soil were determined to be extractable. X-ray diffraction techniques revealed the presence of both anglesite (PbSO4) and hydrocerrusite (Pb3[CO3]2[OH]2Pb) in the Glynwood and sand, and in the river sediment, massicot (PbO) was also detected. Metallic Pb ...

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call