Abstract
Context Although psychiatric research uses clear diagnostic criteria to describe bipolar disorders, therapists in clinical practice are often confronted with patients presenting a number of symptoms with different degrees of intensity and belonging to more than one diagnostic category. With respect to this actual clinical complexity, there is an increasing interest in a dimensional approach of psychopathological traits to gain better understanding of mental disorders. In the 1980s, Robert Cloninger elaborated on a psychobiological model to explain personality in clinical groups as well as in general population. His model was then operationalised with a questionnaire evaluating temperament (harm avoidance, novelty seeking, reward dependence and persistence) and character (self-directeness, cooperativeness, self-transcendence): the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI). Objective To review all studies conducted in adult bipolar samples on temperament and character according to Cloninger's psychobiological model. Materials and methods A search was conducted on MedLine and PsycInfo for all articles written in English or French, between 1986 and September 2008, on temperament and character in bipolar disorder. The words bipolar disorder or mania had to be associated with the following keywords temperament, TCI, Cloninger, TPQ, harm avoidance, novelty seeking, reward dependence. Results Across studies, compared to the general population, bipolar subjects have significantly higher harm avoidance, higher novelty seeking and lower self-directness. Some studies have investigated differences between bipolar disorders and other psychopathologies like depression, and borderline personality disorder. Among studies on depression and bipolar disorder, there is no consensus on the findings. Compared to borderline personality disorder patients, bipolar disorder subjects have lower harm avoidance and higher self-directness and cooperativeness. This finding is consistent with Cloninger's hypothesis that all personality disorders have lower self-directness than any axis I disorder. With respect to other temperament and character traits, studies yielded results either contradictory or non-significant. No difference was found when the bipolar group was subdivided according to the clinical presentation (type I vs II) and the suicidal risk, apart from harm avoidance. Bipolar subjects with substance related disorders displayed higher novelty seeking and lower persistence, which might be explained by a low dopaminergic activity that had to be compensated with drug intake. Low persistence causes greater difficulties to overcome substance dependence. However, it is not possible to determine whether these temperament characteristics are specifically linked to bipolar disorder, substance related disorders, or both. Similar limitations apply to bipolar patients with comorbid anxiety disorders, who presented higher harm avoidance and lower self-directness. Conclusions Across studies, there are limitations which impede the generalization of the findings to other clinical populations. Age, gender, cultural characteristics, mood status during evaluation, group size, versions of the TCI questionnaire, suicidal risk, clinical type (BP I vs II) and comorbidity differ from one study to another. These methodological variables should be controlled in future studies. Nevertheless, adult bipolar patients appear to present a different temperamental profile than other clinical groups and general population. Therefore, Cloninger's psychobiological model of temperament remains an interesting avenue for future researches in bipolar disorder.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have