Abstract

The establishment of constitutional review a posteriori did not fundamentally inflected jurisprudence of the Constitutional Council in the field of health protection. Decisions rendered in QPC material confirms that if the judge agrees to give priority to public health in the exercise of his office, he still refuses to recognize the subjective dimension of the right to individual health.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call