Abstract
In her Métaphysique des sexes (2005), S. Agacinsky tracks the androcentrism in all the doctrinal aspects of the patristic literature from the five first centuries. She drives it out under three main shapes: a ‘‘metasexual’’ divine masculinity ; a physical and spiritual presexual masculinity in the ‘‘image’’ of God that the feminine alterity compromises ; an ethical ideal of spiritual virility that the - asexual or sexless - eschatological state fullfills. Regarding the paulinian universalism of Gal 3, 28, it does not question the hierarchy of the sexes here below, which is spiritually indifferent. Ambrose of Milan would have been the only one exception to this massive androcentrism. A study of the surpassing of the genders by the Cappadocian Fathers, this paper contests such a vision. It especially considers the case of Gregory of Nazianzus, which Agacinsky’s work ignores, but who has been a feminist in his time. In the Cappadocian theology, the divinity transcends not only sexes, but even genders. At the anthropological and soteriological level, we find a complete equality between man and woman, carnal as well as spiritual, with a shared responsibility in the original Fall. Regarding the ethical ability to live the virtuous, ascetic, life, the woman is even more courageous or enduring. Last but not least, the Nazianzen advocates the equality of rights for both sexes in matrimonial matter.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.