Abstract
The present paper wants to offer neither a Husserlian reading of Gustavo Bontadini, nor a “Bontadinian” interpretation of Husserl’s transcendental phenomenology. My aim is more circumscribed, and yet systematic: it consists in providing an examination of both Husserl’s and Bontadini’s interpretation of the history of modern philosophy from Descartes to Kant, in order to bring to the fore analogies and differences between the two. As I will show, Husserl’s reading of the history of modern philosophy is based on a twofold notion of rationality , or, rather, he distinguishes, quite accurately, two concepts of rationality - whose struggle animates and characterizes, from within, the philosophical trajectory of modernity.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
