Abstract

Abstract In order to protect various interests and guarantee legal certainty, the OHADA legislator has provided the essential rules for each form or category of company. Thus, the distinction between joint stock companies and public limited companies is based, in particular, on free negotiability and/or the free transferability of shares. To preserve this distinction, the principle of the free transferability of shares is of a public policy nature and therefore justifies a restriction of the contractual freedom of the partners. The latter may in fact have recourse to agreements relating to the transfer of shares (approval clause, preemption clause, inalienability clause) only on condition that this does not entail the abolition of the principle of the free transferability of shares.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.