LBA02-10 ASSESSING THE RISKS OF A POSITIVE URINE CULTURE IN UNCOMPLICATED RENAL COLIC PATIENTS

Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022LBA02-10 ASSESSING THE RISKS OF A POSITIVE URINE CULTURE IN UNCOMPLICATED RENAL COLIC PATIENTS Nikhile Mookerji, Matthew Mancuso, Vardhil Gandhi, Efrem Violato, Stacey Broomfield, Tim Wollin, Trevor Schuler, and Shubha De Nikhile MookerjiNikhile Mookerji More articles by this author , Matthew MancusoMatthew Mancuso More articles by this author , Vardhil GandhiVardhil Gandhi More articles by this author , Efrem ViolatoEfrem Violato More articles by this author , Stacey BroomfieldStacey Broomfield More articles by this author , Tim WollinTim Wollin More articles by this author , Trevor SchulerTrevor Schuler More articles by this author , and Shubha DeShubha De More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002670.10AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Though septic stones are well recognized as a medical emergency, patients with uncomplicated renal colic (without systemic inflammatory responses or renal impairment) and positive urine cultures pose a dilemma in management considerations. Therefore, the objective of this study is to: 1) Assess the rate of ‘incidental’ positive urine cultures in patients with ureteral stones referred to our Stone Clinic. 2) Determine the risk of infectious adverse events (IAE) in patients with ureteral stones and positive urine cultures. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for all Acute Stone Clinic referrals between November 10, 2019 and October 1, 2020. Urgent referrals necessitating immediate intervention were excluded. Demographics, investigations, procedures, unscheduled visits, and IAE were all documented. Descriptive statistics were used to group patients based on their urine cultures (UC). RESULTS: Over the study period 1029 patients were identified, and 35.4% (n=374) of them had urine cultures (UC) drawn at presentation. Of the 655 patients without UC, 0.6% (n=6) eventually developed sepsis and required urgent renal decompression. 87% (n=333) of UC completed at presentation were negative (no growth or mixed flora), and none of these patients went on to have an IAE. Of the 13% of urine cultures that were positive (n=39) only 2 IAEs (5.13%) were identified, 2-30 days after initial presentation. Both patients had normal acute phase reactants (WBC, CRP) and a history of recurrent UTIs. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one third of patients referred to our Acute Stone clinic had UC at presentation, with an overall delayed IAE rate of 0.7%. Of those with positive urine cultures, only 5% experienced an IAE, suggesting conservative management may be a reasonable consideration in this patient population. Source of Funding: None © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e1045 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Nikhile Mookerji More articles by this author Matthew Mancuso More articles by this author Vardhil Gandhi More articles by this author Efrem Violato More articles by this author Stacey Broomfield More articles by this author Tim Wollin More articles by this author Trevor Schuler More articles by this author Shubha De More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...