Lay Judges in the German Criminal Courts

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessLay Judges in the German Criminal CourtsGerhard Casper and Hans ZeiselGerhard Casper Search for more articles by this author and Hans Zeisel Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Legal Studies Volume 1, Number 1Jan., 1972 Sponsored by The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/467481 Views: 34Total views on this site Citations: 34Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1972 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Stefan Machura, Christoph Rennig “In the Name of the People”, (Jul 2021): 152–173.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108669290.008Anna Offit Dismissing the Jury, (Jul 2021): 197–217.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108669290.010Frans van Dijk Perceptions of Lay Judges About Independence of the Judiciary, (Dec 2020): 53–63.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63143-7_4Yumiko Kita An Analysis of a Lay Adjudication System and Open Judiciary, (Jan 2020): 2522–2538.https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9860-2.ch114Gordan Struić PRAVNO UREĐENJE KVALIFIKACIJA ZA PARTICIPACIJU GRAĐANA LAIKA U SUĐENJU U HRVATSKOJ OD 1848. DO 2018., Pravni vjesnik 35, no.3-43-4 (Dec 2019): 105–142.https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/8154Shamena Anwar, Patrick Bayer, Randi Hjalmarsson Politics in the Courtroom: Political Ideology and Jury Decision Making, Journal of the European Economic Association 17, no.33 (Apr 2018): 834–875.https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvy013Anna Offit The Jury Is Out: An Ethnographic Study of Lay Participation in the Norwegian Legal System, PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 41, no.22 (Dec 2018): 231–246.https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12268Xin He Double Whammy: Lay Assessors as Lackeys in Chinese Courts, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2017).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2906174Yumiko Kita An Analysis of a Lay Adjudication System and Open Judiciary, (Jan 2017): 93–109.https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0717-8.ch005Xin He Double Whammy: Lay Assessors as Lackeys in Chinese Courts, Law & Society Review 50, no.33 (Jul 2016): 733–765.https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12218Andrew Watson The Judicial Reform CouncilThe Judicial Reform Council and Its Recommendations, (Oct 2016): 69–85.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-35077-6_5Shamena Anwar, Patrick J. Bayer, Randi Hjalmarsson Politics in the Courtroom: Political Ideology and Jury Decision Making, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2015).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2600655 Jong Goo Kim Understanding the Short History of Plea Bargaining, Dankook Law Riview 36, no.22 (Dec 2012): 993–1009.https://doi.org/10.17252/dlr.2012.36.2.036Mar Jimeno-Bulnes American Criminal Procedure in a European Context, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2012).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2276682Stephen Ross Levitt The Life and Times of a Local Court Judge in Berlin, German Law Journal 10, no.33 (Mar 2019): 169–204.https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200001012Stefan Machura Lay Assessors of German Administrative Courts: Fairness, Power-Distance Orientation, and Deliberation Activity, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 4, no.22 (Jul 2007): 331–363.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00091.xYohsuke Ohtsubo, Ayumi Masuchi Effects of Status Difference and Group Size in Group Decision Making, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 7, no.22 (Jul 2016): 161–172.https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430204043723Sanja Kutnjak Ivkovic An Inside View: Professional Judges' and Lay Judges' Support for Mixed Tribunals, Law <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Policy 25, no.22 (Apr 2003): 93–122.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9930.2003.00142.xSanja Kutnjak Ivković Satisfaction with the actual experience: Croatian lay judges on their experience in mixed tribunals, International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 25, no.11 (Mar 2001): 25–48.https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2001.9678662Sanja Kutnjak Ivkovich Mixed tribunals in Croatia, Revue internationale de droit pénal 72, no.11 (Jan 2001): 57.https://doi.org/10.3917/ridp.721.0057Martin F. Kaplan, Ana M. Martin Effects of Differential Status of Group Members on Process and Outcome of Deliberation, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 2, no.44 (Jul 2016): 347–364.https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430299024003Dean J. Spader Teaching comparative criminal procedure: Russian dolls, color charts, and cappuccino, Journal of Criminal Justice Education 10, no.11 (Mar 1999): 111–136.https://doi.org/10.1080/10511259900084491Sanja Kutnjak Ivkovie Small Towns and the Big City: Examining Differences in the Work of Croatian Mixed Tribunals, International Criminal Justice Review 7, no.11 (Jul 2016): 81–102.https://doi.org/10.1177/105756779700700105R. H. C. Teske, H.-J. Albrecht Prosecution and Sentencing Patterns in the Federal Republic of Germany, International Criminal Justice Review 2, no.11 (May 1992): 76–104.https://doi.org/10.1177/105756779200200105Shari Seidman Diamond Revising Images of Public Punitiveness: Sentencing by Lay and Professional English Magistrates, Law & Social Inquiry 15, no.0202 (Dec 2018): 191–221.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1990.tb00586.xBruce Wardhaugh Socratic Civil Disobedience: Some Reflections on Morgentaler, Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 2, no.22 (Jun 2015): 91–110.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0841820900002782Shari Seidman Diamond Using psychology to control law: From deceptive advertising to criminal sentencing., Law and Human Behavior 13, no.33 (Jan 1989): 239–252.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067028 John F. Padgett The Emergent Organization of Plea Bargaining, American Journal of Sociology 90, no.44 (Oct 2015): 753–800.https://doi.org/10.1086/228144Dirk van Zyl Smit, Norma-May Isakow Assessors and Criminal Justice, South African Journal on Human Rights 1, no.33 (Feb 2017): 218–235.https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.1985.11827679John H. Langbein Mixed Court and Jury Court: Could the Continental Alternative Fill the American Need?, American Bar Foundation Research Journal 6, no.11 (Nov 2018): 195–219.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1981.tb00426.xJim Hackler, Joan Brockman Opinion-Role Typologies for Cross Cultural Comparisons of Juvenile Courts, Juvenile and Family Court Journal 31, no.44 (Nov 1980): 61–76.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6988.1980.tb01219.x Thomas Weigend Continental Cures for American Ailments: European Criminal Procedure as a Model for Law Reform, Crime and Justice 2 (Oct 2015): 381–428.https://doi.org/10.1086/449073Jacek Kurczewski Aspekte der Laiengerichtsbarkeit, (Jan 1980): 425–436.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-96990-3_25JAMES C. HACKLER, JOAN BROCKMAN Attitudes Toward Delinquency by Court Officials: Comparisons Between North America and Europe, International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 3, no.11 (Jan 1979): 3–25.https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.1979.9688663