Abstract
By analyzing nine influential titles in comparative politics, namely Polanyi’s The Great Transformation, Ertman’s Birth of the Leviathan, Gellner’s Nations and Nationalism, Foucault’s Discipline and Punish, Huntington’s Political Order in Changing Societies, Schumpeter’s Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, Dennett’s Darwin’s Dangerous Idea, King et al.’s Designing Social Inquiry, and Geertz’s The Interpretation of Cultures, this essay proposes a new method of analysis in a reconstructed theoretical space. I first categorize the nine titles into two provisional groups – “law-finders” and “storytellers.” This is done by examining the works along three analytical dimensions – structure-agency, dynamism-stationarity and epistemologically, positivism-interpretivism. Once recast on this new space, the nine titles reveal five subtle, surprising and potentially illuminating patterns that have been missing from the conventional law-story distinction. Some of these patterns have never been explicitly addressed in the relevant comparative politics or political theory literature and therefore deserve further inquiry.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
