Abstract
Law today lives in images the way images live on the screen. Visualizing law in real cases — through visual evidence and visual argument — is now becoming an increasingly routine part of legal practice in the United States, the United Kingdom and elsewhere. Viewers are used to being moved, edified and delighted (and at times titillated or even horrified) by what they see and hear on electronic screens both large and small. But what are the implications when the search for fact-based justice inside the courtroom depends upon those very responses? What does it mean for our system of law when the emotions we feel, or the sheer aesthetic delight, or the memories that are evoked, or the fantasies and desires that are activated by visual images become the motive force underlying legal judgment?
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.