Abstract
This article analyzes Clement Fatovic’s recent book, Outside the Law: Emergency and Executive Power a scholarly examination of thinking on executive power in emergencies by delegates to our Constitutional Convention and by political writers who influenced them. Fatovic concludes that the President does and should have the “prerogative” to act outside or even contrary to the law in emergencies. Mr. Abbott disagrees. Outside the Law demonstrates that the delegates to the Constitutional Convention understood the importance of executive power in emergencies and the Constitution which emerged in 1787 did indeed bestow broad executive power on the President. But it did not authorize the President to exercise “prerogative” in emergencies in violation of law. Nor would reliance on undefined “prerogative” for authority to act foster the planning and training which is so important to successful emergency response.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.