Abstract
There is an astonishingly high incidence of scandal among firms in the Chinese emerging market. This paper empirically examines whether certain corporate governance mechanisms are related to the probability of a firm being associated with corporate scandal. Using a sample of Chinese listed firms convicted for fraud, we find that firm ownership is related to the probability of a firm committing fraud, whereas other corporate governance characteristics such as board size, board independence, and institutional ownership are not. These findings suggest that in general governance mechanisms have not helped avoid serious corporate scandals in China. Further analysis indicates that the level of development of a country's legal system is related to the probability of a firm committing fraud. Together, our results suggest that without effective legal enforcement, corporate governance mechanisms will not be able to protect minority shareholders and facilitate stock market development in emerging markets.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.