Abstract
Contrasting views of science--as a realist enterprise or a social construction--and differing opinions as to whether the link between law and science should be strong or weak, produce roughly four different perspectives on law and science: realism but weak link, realism and strong link, social constructivism and weak link, and social constructivism but strong link. The first three perspectives recur in post-Daubert legal literature, and the fourth appears self-defeating and impractical. I argue, however, that the fourth view is the least problematic and the most appropriate.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
