Abstract

The levy of service charge in India is at present highly contented, which has led to a war of words among various authorities of the country. This paperinvestigatesthree scenarios through an economical lens and within the boundaries of the consumer rights. The pros of the three scenarios are then weighed against its cons to reach a final recommendation of the study which in turn also proves all the three scenarios which are contended in the country at present as economically inefficient. The findings of the study show that the first scenario of tipping is proved inefficient asIndia does not have a strong tipping culture leading to undertipping, along with that tips are only realised to the front-end workers and not the back-end workers or the cleaning staff. Secondly, the next scenario contemplates on mandatory service charge being added by default to the bill itself which is proved inefficient as it takes away the discretion of the consumers and also leads to deception of consumers resulting in the violation of consumer rights and reducing consumer surplus as a high cost. Finally, the paper looks into the aspect ofthe service charge being added within the price of the food itself, being inefficient because a part of the producer surplus is lost as rent paid due to revenue sharing clauses in lease agreements and the consumer being worse off due to lack of discretion in price paid for service.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call