Abstract

As clinical legal education (CLE) continues to evolve and prepare practice-ready lawyers, and governments worldwide focus on the multilayered impact of technology, automation and artificial intelligence, there is a pressing need to examine law and entrepreneurship through the lens of global clinical legal education. The range of issues include: corporate social responsibility, disruptive technologies, microbusiness, social entrepreneurship, social impact investing, the creative economy, sustainable local economies, cooperatives and shared work, and inclusive entrepreneurship.Indeed, new legal entities like benefit corporations and low profit limited liability companies (L3Cs) have emerged to address contemporary legal needs and in the United States, the notion of an entrepreneurial mindset is prominent. Many of today’s law students are Millennial generation, ages 18-34, while others are digital natives who have not known a world without technology.Business law clinics (BLCs), also referred to as transactional clinics, representing for profit, nonprofit or nongovernmental (NGOs) organizations and social enterprises aim to support the growth of entrepreneurial ecosystems while promoting social and economic justice. BLCs teach law students substantive law, practical skills and professional values. Indeed, BLCs with a social and economic justice perspective can help law students, the next generation of leaders, to develop critical analytic skills and insights into how entrepreneurship supports and sometimes hurts human rights and civil society efforts.Part one of this article examines the evolution of global CLE in western countries like the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and in Georgia and Croatia. Part two discusses a more recent phenomenon in CLE, the emergence of BLCs, which expand the clinical experience beyond the courtroom to the boardroom, and the differences and similarities between litigation and transactional legal clinics. Part three examines the rise in BLCs globally, and contains case studies of the global experience in transactional CLE with perspectives from Georgia, Croatia, Australia, Canada and the U.K. Part four considers the unique pedagogical and programmatic aspects of BLCs, such as redefining “practice-ready,” teaching Millennials, and collaboration as a lawyering skill. Part five reflects on the significance of BLCs now. In Part six the article concludes by looking to the future of BLCs in a global context. The article also includes an Appendix 1 with BLC Lawyering Competencies and Learning Outcomes and Appendix 2 with a Checklist for Starting or Re-Imagining a BLC.

Highlights

  • As clinical legal education (CLE) continues to evolve and prepare practice-ready lawyers, and governments worldwide focus on the multilayered impact of technology, automation and artificial intelligence, there is a pressing need to examine law and entrepreneurship through the lens of global clinical legal education

  • 1* Janet Thompson Jackson directs the Small Business and Nonprofit Transactional Clinic at Washburn University School of Law. She is a past co-president of the Clinical Legal Education Association and a past co-chair of the Transactional Clinics Committee of the Association of American Law Schools Clinical Section

  • An early version of this article was preseted at the 3rd European Network for Clinical Legal Education (ENCLE) Conference 2015 in Budapest, Hungary 2 Calvin Gladney, Happy Better Lawyer, http://www.happierbetterlawyer.com/home/; David E

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

As clinical legal education (CLE) continues to evolve and prepare practice-ready lawyers, and governments worldwide focus on the multilayered impact of technology, automation and artificial intelligence, there is a pressing need to examine law and entrepreneurship through the lens of global clinical legal education. In the case of BLCs, this funding came from the U.S Small Business Administration, state and local governments, and the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.[24] BLCs grew in the U.S between the late 1970s through the mid1990s with more than 150 transactional clinics at 200 American Bar Association (ABA) approved law schools today.[25] This article analyzes the rapid growth of the BLC movement It seeks to address the questions of why so many business clinics were created at American law schools and whether there are useful lessons from the U.S experience that can inform the global clinical legal education movement and vice versa. L., 193, 217-18 (Dec. 29, 2017). 29 Jones and Lainez at 121

BLCs in the United Kingdom
BLCs in Canada
Redefining “Practice-Ready”: Social Justice
Collaboration and Beyond
PART VI: CONCLUSION
Findings
Oral and Written Advocacy
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.