Lavoisier and the Origins of Modern Chemistry

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessContextual Factors and the Explanation of Scientific ChangeLavoisier and the Origins of Modern ChemistryArthur DonovanArthur Donovan Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Osiris Volume 4, Number 11988The Chemical Revolution: Essays in Reinterpretation Published for the History of Science Society Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/368679 Views: 20Total views on this site Citations: 12Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1988 The History of Science Society, Inc.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Gustavo Picazo The Long Shadow of Semantic Platonism, Philosophia 49, no.44 (Feb 2021): 1427–1453.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-020-00304-4Larry Kolopajlo Analytical Methodologies for Arsenic, Selenium, and Mercury: A Historical Perspective, (Oct 2017): 141–172.https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2017-1263.ch008Hasok Chang Water and the Chemical Revolution, (Feb 2012): 1–70.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3932-1_1Hasok Chang We Have Never Been Whiggish (About Phlogiston) 1, Centaurus 51, no.44 (Oct 2009): 239–264.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0498.2009.00150.xDavid Philip Miller 'Distributing Discovery' between Watt and Cavendish: A Reassessment of the Nineteenth-Century 'Water Controversy', Annals of Science 59, no.22 (Nov 2010): 149–178.https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790110044747Noel G Coley Lavoisier, Antoine Laurent, (Apr 2001).https://doi.org/10.1038/npg.els.0002502Elizabeth Garber Eighteenth—Century Physics and Mathematics: A Reassessment, (Jan 1999): 63–91.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1766-4_3Christian Licoppe Bibliographie, (Jan 1996): 326–342.https://doi.org/10.3917/dec.licop.1996.01.0326James W. McAllister Scientific realism and the criteria for theory-choice, Erkenntnis 38, no.22 (Mar 1993): 203–222.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128980Prajit K. Basu Similarities and dissimilarities between Joseph Priestley's and Antoine Lavoisier's chemical beliefs, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 23, no.33 (Sep 1992): 445–469.https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(92)90004-P Lissa Roberts A Word and the World: The Significance of Naming the Calorimeter, Isis 82, no.22 (Oct 2015): 198–222.https://doi.org/10.1086/355725Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent A view of the chemical revolution through contemporary textbooks: Lavoisier, Fourcroy and Chaptal, The British Journal for the History of Science 23, no.44 (Jan 2009): 435–460.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087400028089