Abstract
This essay traces a line of thought from Kant’s phenomenology of laughter in Critique of Judgment through Hannah Arendt’s appropriation and modification of Kantian reflective judgment in order to explore how laughter may inform a mode and style of political judgment I call the politics of laughter. I argue that laughter is a pleasurable affective response to the contingency of experience, an affect which can infuse political judgment and open the possibility of a more affirmative democratic politics. The last section of the essay imagines a series of conversations emerging from a viewing of the movie Borat in order to show what issues would be raised, and in what tone conversation would proceed, in a politics of laughter.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
