Abstract
Jokes and humour about mental distress are said by anti-stigma campaigners to be no laughing matter. The article takes issue with this viewpoint, arguing that this is clearly not the case since popular culture past and present has laughed at the antics of those perceived as “mad”. Drawing on past and present examples of the othering of insanity in jokes and humour, the article incorporates a historical perspective on continuity and change in humour about madness/mental distress, which enables us to recognize that psychiatry is a funny-peculiar enterprise and its therapeutic practices in past times are deserving of funny ha-ha mockery and mirth in the present. By doing so, the article also argues that humour and mental distress illuminate how psychiatric definitions and popular representations conflict and that some psychiatric service users employ comic ambiguity to reflexively puncture their public image as “nuts”.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
