Abstract
The lattice thermal conductivity of layered group 4 disulfides ${\mathrm{TiS}}_{2}$, ${\mathrm{ZrS}}_{2}$, and ${\mathrm{HfS}}_{2}$ has been studied using dispersion-corrected hybrid density functional methods. Results obtained using both relaxation time approximation (RTA) and full solution of linearized Boltzmann transport equation have been compared and rigorously analyzed. The periodic trends of lattice thermal conductivity and its components are investigated in detail. The in-plane RTA lattice thermal conductivities of ${\mathrm{TiS}}_{2}$, ${\mathrm{ZrS}}_{2}$, and ${\mathrm{HfS}}_{2}$ at 300 K are 6.1, 8.5, and $11.7\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{W}\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}{\mathrm{m}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}{\mathrm{K}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$, respectively. In the cross-plane direction, where the metal sulfide layers are kept together by weak van der Waals interactions, the RTA lattice thermal conductivities of ${\mathrm{TiS}}_{2}$, ${\mathrm{ZrS}}_{2}$, and ${\mathrm{HfS}}_{2}$ at 300 K are 1.4, 1.4, and $2.0\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{W}\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}{\mathrm{m}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}{\mathrm{K}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$, respectively.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.