Abstract

Sexual dimorphism is common across the animal kingdom, but the contribution of environmental factors shaping differences between the sexes remains controversial. In ectotherms, life‐history traits are known to correlate with latitude, but sex‐specific responses are not well understood. We analyzed life‐history trait variation between the sexes of European perch (Perca fluviatilis L.), a common freshwater fish displaying larger female size, by employing a wide latitudinal gradient. We expected to find sex‐dependent latitudinal variation in life‐history variables: length at age, length increment, and size at maturity, with females showing consistently higher values than males at all latitudes. We further anticipated that this gender difference would progressively decrease with the increasingly harsh environmental conditions toward higher latitude. We hypothesized that growth and length increment would decrease and size/age at maturity would increase at higher latitudes. Our results confirmed female‐biased sexual size dimorphism at all latitudes and the magnitude of sexual dimorphism diminished with increase in latitude. Growth of both sexes decreased with increase in latitude, and the female latitudinal clines were steeper than those of males. Hence, we challenge two predominant ecological rules (Rensch's and Bergmann's rules) that describe common large‐scale patterns of body size variation. Our data demonstrate that these two rules are not universally applicable in ectotherms or female‐biased species. Our study highlights the importance of sex‐specific differences in life‐history traits along a latitudinal gradient, with evident implications for a wide range of studies from individual to ecosystems level.

Highlights

  • Size difference between the sexes is a common phenomenon among animals, but pronounced inter-­ and intraspecific variation exists in the magnitude of sexual size dimorphism (SSD) (Blanckenhorn, Stillwell, Young, Fox, & Ashton, 2006; Cox, Barrett, & John-­Alder, 2008)

  • All perch populations studied exhibited significant sexual dimorphism in growth, size, and maturity, with females growing larger and maturing later than males. Growth of both sexes decreased and the length at maturity increased with latitude, but latitudinal trends were generally steeper in females than in males

  • The magnitude of SSD diminished in concert with increase in latitude, suggesting stronger sensitivity of females to latitudinal variation, because female body size showed an increased plasticity relative to males

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Size difference between the sexes is a common phenomenon among animals, but pronounced inter-­ and intraspecific variation exists in the magnitude of sexual size dimorphism (SSD) (Blanckenhorn, Stillwell, Young, Fox, & Ashton, 2006; Cox, Barrett, & John-­Alder, 2008). Large individuals require more food to attain larger size and to maintain body functions (Blanckenhorn, 1998), and are likely more sensitive to thermal variation via their higher metabolic rates (Pörtner & Peck, 2010) This follows that changes in the environment, such as latitudinal variation, may have a greater impact on the larger sex in SSD-­displaying species. As the energy demand of female perch is higher than that of males (Malison, Best, Kayes, & Amundson, 1985), in addition to the higher sensitivity of females to thermal variation (Estlander et al, 2015), we expected females to show a steeper latitudinal variation in growth This follows that sex-­specific differences in growth and size would decrease toward higher latitude and would produce a pattern of SSD contrary to the prediction of Rensch’s rule. Possible explanations for observed patterns of SSD are discussed

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call