Abstract

Attending to a task-relevant location changes how neural activity oscillates in the alpha band (8–13Hz) in posterior visual cortical areas. However, a clear understanding of the relationships between top-down attention, changes in alpha oscillations in visual cortex, and attention performance are still poorly understood. Here, we tested the degree to which the posterior alpha power tracked the locus of attention, the distribution of attention, and how well the topography of alpha could predict the locus of attention. We recorded magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data while subjects performed an attention demanding visual discrimination task that dissociated the direction of attention from the direction of a saccade to indicate choice. On some trials, an endogenous cue predicted the target’s location, while on others it contained no spatial information. When the target’s location was cued, alpha power decreased in sensors over occipital cortex contralateral to the attended visual field. When the cue did not predict the target’s location, alpha power again decreased in sensors over occipital cortex, but bilaterally, and increased in sensors over frontal cortex. Thus, the distribution and the topography of alpha reliably indicated the locus of covert attention. Together, these results suggest that alpha synchronization reflects changes in the excitability of populations of neurons whose receptive fields match the locus of attention. This is consistent with the hypothesis that alpha oscillations reflect the neural mechanisms by which top-down control of attention biases information processing and modulate the activity of neurons in visual cortex.

Highlights

  • Spatial attention selects subsets of locations in cluttered environments that contain information relevant to the current or near-future goals

  • Our functional magnetic resonance imaging studies showed that neural activity in portions of prefrontal cortex (PFC) and the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) persists during the maintenance of spatial

  • Consistent with past studies of endogenous guidance of attention, compared to the neutral condition with high uncertainty (M = 85.78%, SD = 5.86), subjects performed significantly better when the target was cued and they attended Left (M = 88.48%, SD = 4.95, paired-t(15) = 3.37, p < .005) or attended Right (M = 88.32%, SD = 5.02, paired-t(15) = 2.44, p < .03)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Spatial attention selects subsets of locations in cluttered environments that contain information relevant to the current or near-future goals. In the context of similar data from both monkey electrophysiology and human neuroimaging studies, these results support the theory that neural population activity in PFC and PPC forms spatial maps of attentional priority [2,3,4,5,6,7]. The read-out of these priority maps may form the basis for biasing activity in visual cortex in favor of neurons whose receptive fields match the prioritized locations. Neural activity is enhanced in visual neurons when the locus of attention matches a neuron’s receptive field [8,9,10,11,12]. The read-out of priority maps by visual cortex may be the mechanism by which attention biases activity in favor of the neurons whose receptive fields contain the attended stimulus

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call