Abstract

Second-order amplitude modulation is a relatively slow variation of the modulation depth of a first-order amplitude modulation with higher frequency. In contrast to first-order modulation, which appears as a physical component in the stimulus spectrum after half-wave rectification, second-order modulation is not necessarily demodulated by the auditory periphery. For binaural processing of second-order amplitude modulated stimuli it is unknown whether interaural time differences (ITDs) in the second-order modulation result in a lateralized percept. Thus, second-order modulation can serve as a tool to investigate whether demodulation of interaurally delayed components is a prerequisite for lateralization. In most of the psychoacoustic experiments presented here, a 25 Hz sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) 160 Hz tone was either transposed to 4 kHz by half-wave rectifying this SAM waveform before multiplication with a 4 kHz tone (TSAM), or by adding an offset before multiplication (SAMAM). The experiments revealed an inability to lateralize the SAMAM based on ITDs in the 25 Hz component, whereas subjects could lateralize the TSAM. Given that only the TSAM results in a demodulated 25 Hz component after peripheral auditory processing, this result supports the hypothesis that demodulation is a prerequisite for lateralization, which has consequences for temporal modulation processing in models of binaural interaction.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.