Abstract
In two experiments subjects performed tapping tasks requiring different degree of muscular repositioning while concurrently performing a speech task. In all concurrent speech conditions right-hand performance was disrupted more than left-hand performance, but the degree of this differential disruption did not alter as a function of the muscular repositioning requirements of the dual-tasks. It was concluded that rapid muscular repositioning does not appear to be the source of lateralised interference effects observed in concurrent task studies. However, it may be argued that some minimum level of repositioning is required, particularly if the differential effect reflects a lateralisation of “kind” rather than of “degree”. This needs further research. One relevant factor proposed here which may alter the degree of lateralised effects is the degree of muscular effort required to perform each of the dual-tasks.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.