Lateral retraction could achieve better early postoperative knee function than patellar eversion in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abstract

Comparisons between patellar eversion (PE) and lateral retraction (LR) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are still inconclusive. To determine the most suitable procedure, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PE and LR in TKA in this meta-analysis. This meta-analysis complied with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Web-based literature databases, including WANFANG, VIP, CNKI, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed, were utilized to conduct a comprehensive literature search for studies published until June 2022 that compared PE with LR in primary TKA. The quality of the selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was evaluated using guidelines of the Cochrane Reviews Handbook 5.0.2. A total of 10 RCTs, including 782 patients and 823 TKAs, were selected in this meta-analysis. Our results showed that using LR improved postoperative knee extensor function and range of motion (ROM). In addition, PE and LR resulted in similar clinical benefits in terms of Knee Society Function score, pain, length of hospital stay, Insall-Salvati ratio, the occurrence of patella baja, and complications related to the operation. Existing evidence suggested that using LR in TKA improved early postoperative knee function. Similar clinical and radiographic outcomes were obtained 1 year after the procedures were performed. Based on these findings, we recommended the use of LR in TKA. However, studies with large sample sizes are needed to validate these findings.