Lateral or Medial Surgical Approaches for Thalamic Gliomas Resection?

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the selection, safety, and prognosis of medial (transcorpus callosal) and lateral (translateral brain gyrus) approaches for adult thalamic glioma resection. The medical records of adult patients with thalamic glioma between March 2006 and March 2016 in Huashan Hospital were reviewed. The probabilistic map of the gliomas was shown in Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space, and a paralleling midline was delineated to decide the approach. The extent of resection, complications, adjuvant treatment, and survival data were analyzed. A literature review was also conducted. Fifty-three patients with thalamic glioma were enrolled. Eighteen patients received tumor resection by a medial approach and 35 by a lateral approach. The probabilistic map based on 20 patients showed that 9 gliomas with ≥45% located in the medial side were treated medially and the other 11 gliomas were treated laterally. Both approaches achieved adequate extent of resection with similar morbidity. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference of overall survival by a transcorpus callosal or translateral brain gyrus approach. Total resection (TR) or subtotal resection (STR) (P= 0.0003), radiochemotherapy (P < 0.0001), and low-grade glioma (P= 0.031) were correlated with better OS. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that TR/STR (P= 0.007; 95% confidence interval, 1.345-6.287) and radiochemotherapy (P < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval, 4.740-71.569) were independent prognostic factors for adult thalamic gliomas. Both medial and lateral approaches are feasible and adequate for resection of thalamic gliomas. The paramidline paralleling midline crossing the genu of the internal capsule could help make the choice. TR/STR, radiochemotherapy, and low-grade glioma could benefit the prognosis.