Abstract

BackgroundMost evidence regarding lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer is from expert settings. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this procedure in a practice-based cohort.MethodsA total of 383 patients who were diagnosed with stage II–III mid-to-low rectal cancer between 2010 and 2019 and underwent primary resection with curative intent at a general surgery unit were retrospectively reviewed. After propensity matching, 144 patients were divided into the following groups for short- and long-term outcome evaluation: mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection (n = 72) and mesorectal excision (n = 72).ResultsThis practice-based cohort was characterized by a high pT4 (41.6%) and R1 resection (10.4%) rate. Although the operative time was longer in the lateral dissection group (349 min vs. 237 min, p < 0.001), postoperative complications (19.4% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.829), and hospital stay (18 days vs. 22 days, p = 0.059) did not significantly differ; 5-year relapse-free survival (62.5% vs. 66.4%, p = 0.378), and cumulative local recurrence (9.7% vs. 15.3%, p = 0.451) were also in the same range in both groups. In the seven locally recurrent cases in the lateral dissection group, four had undergone R1 resection.ConclusionsLateral lymph node dissection was found to be safe in this practice-based cohort; however, the local control effect was not obvious. To maximize the potential merits of lateral lymph node dissection, strategies need to be urgently established to avoid R1 resection in clinical practice.

Highlights

  • Most evidence regarding lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer is from expert settings

  • There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, Fig. 2 Image after right lateral lymph node dissection

  • In the JSCCR guidelines [6], mesorectal excision (ME) + lateral lymph node dissection (LLD) is recommended as a standard procedure for locally advanced lower rectal cancer on the basis of its local control effect demonstrated in the JCOG0212 trial [4, 5]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Most evidence regarding lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer is from expert settings. The incidence of lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM) in stage II/III low rectal cancer is reported to be 7–20% [1,2,3,4,5]; it is associated with local recurrence and poor overall survival. The JCOG (Japanese Clinical Oncology Group) 0212 trial reported on the safety and efficacy of LLD [4, 5] The results of this trial showed similar morbidity rates and relapse-free survival (RFS) between mesorectal excision (ME) followed by LLD (ME + LLD) and ME alone groups, with lesser local recurrence in the former; the investigators concluded that ME + LLD should be considered the standard surgical procedure for stage II/III low rectal cancer in Japan. The impact of LLD on local control in mid-to-low rectal cancer remains unclear

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call