Abstract

AbstractAnalytical models for shear strength and deformation capacity estimation of reinforced concrete members are essential for the practical implementation of performance‐based seismic evaluation of existing structures and form a key part of current seismic assessment codes (e.g., EN 1998‐3 (2005), (2022), ASCE/SEI 41‐17). Although these models have been derived from regression or calibration of large datasets collected from experimental literature, discrepancy persists between experimental and analytical estimates, especially in cases of members with old‐type detailing. The evident uncertainty about parametric dependencies of the underlying mechanistic problem motivated the present work, where a set of benchmark columns that represent older structural detailing are studied parametrically through advanced finite element simulation. Parameters considered were, the axial load ratio, transverse reinforcement amount and spacing, longitudinal reinforcement ratio, and anchorage/lap splice detailing; results were gauged in terms of the resulting drift ratio (deformation capacity) at the performance limit states and were compared with the Code estimates to evaluate their limits and conservatism. The simulation results were used to vet the assumptions that underlie the simple mechanistic models used in deriving seismic design expressions for yield and ultimate deformation capacities, shear strength, and the rate of its degradation with increasing ductility.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call