Abstract

During navigation, landmark processing is critical either for generating an allocentric-based cognitive map or in facilitating egocentric-based strategies. Increasing evidence from manipulation and single-unit recording studies has highlighted the role of the entorhinal cortex in processing landmarks. In particular, the lateral (LEC) and medial (MEC) sub-regions of the entorhinal cortex have been shown to attend to proximal and distal landmarks, respectively. Recent studies have identified a further dissociation in cue processing between the LEC and MEC based on spatial frames of reference. Neurons in the LEC preferentially encode egocentric cues while those in the MEC encode allocentric cues. In this study, we assessed the impact of disrupting the LEC on landmark-based spatial memory in both egocentric and allocentric reference frames. Animals that received excitotoxic lesions of the LEC were significantly impaired, relative to controls, on both egocentric and allocentric versions of an object–place association task. Notably, LEC lesioned animals performed at chance on the egocentric version but above chance on the allocentric version. There was no significant difference in performance between the two groups on an object recognition and spatial T-maze task. Taken together, these results indicate that the LEC plays a role in feature integration more broadly and in specifically processing spatial information within an egocentric reference frame.

Highlights

  • Spatial memory and navigation require us to learn and remember the locations of landmarks within our environment

  • The hippocampal–entorhinal network has been shown to be critical for spatial memory (Ainge et al, 2006, 2007; Ainge and Langston, 2012; Andersen et al, 2006; Broadbent et al, 2004; Martin and Clark, 2007; Morris et al, 1982; Save and Sargolini, 2017; Steffenach et al, 2005; Van Cauter et al, 2013)

  • Rats would have to first situate themselves in more global, allocentric space before being able to make an associative memory judgement as the positions of the objects would have moved relative to an egocentric framework

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Spatial memory and navigation require us to learn and remember the locations of landmarks within our environment. Recent studies of MEC have demonstrated a number of clearly spatially modulated signals These include grid cells (Hafting et al, 2005), head direction cells (Sargolini et al., 2006), border cells (Barry et al, 2006; Solstad et al, 2008), conjunctive cells (Sargolini et al, 2006), and object vector cells (Høydal et al, 2019). These spatial signals are all tied to landmarks, landmarks in these studies are represented by a range of stimuli from distal room cues to objects close in proximity to the animal

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call