Abstract

BackgroundSeveral types of statistical methods are currently available for the meta-analysis of studies on diagnostic test accuracy. One of these methods is the Bivariate Model which involves a simultaneous analysis of the sensitivity and specificity from a set of studies. In this paper, we review the characteristics of the Bivariate Model and demonstrate how it can be extended with a discrete latent variable. The resulting clustering of studies yields additional insight into the accuracy of the test of interest.MethodsA Latent Class Bivariate Model is proposed. This model captures the between-study variability in sensitivity and specificity by assuming that studies belong to one of a small number of latent classes. This yields both an easier to interpret and a more precise description of the heterogeneity between studies. Latent classes may not only differ with respect to the average sensitivity and specificity, but also with respect to the correlation between sensitivity and specificity.ResultsThe Latent Class Bivariate Model identifies clusters of studies with their own estimates of sensitivity and specificity. Our simulation study demonstrated excellent parameter recovery and good performance of the model selection statistics typically used in latent class analysis. Application in a real data example on coronary artery disease showed that the inclusion of latent classes yields interesting additional information.ConclusionsOur proposed new meta-analysis method can lead to a better fit of the data set of interest, less biased estimates and more reliable confidence intervals for sensitivities and specificities. But even more important, it may serve as an exploratory tool for subsequent sub-group meta-analyses.

Highlights

  • Several types of statistical methods are currently available for the meta-analysis of studies on diagnostic test accuracy

  • We evaluated Bias, Power, and Confidence

  • Simulation study Bias The results of the simulation study show that BM yields a systematic bias if sensitivity or specificity differs across latent classes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Several types of statistical methods are currently available for the meta-analysis of studies on diagnostic test accuracy. One of these methods is the Bivariate Model which involves a simultaneous analysis of the sensitivity and specificity from a set of studies. Several statistical methods for meta-analysis of data from diagnostic test accuracy studies have been proposed [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Methods for the meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity are still an active field of research and debate. One frequently used method involves generating a ROC curve using simple linear regression [6,7]. Rutter and Gatsonis [9] suggested that in the presence of a substantial amount of heterogeneity, the results of metaanalyses should be presented as Summary ROC curves

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call