Abstract

Reward signals encoded in the mesolimbic dopaminergic system guide approach/seeking behaviors to all varieties of life-supporting stimuli (rewards). Differences in dopamine (DA) levels have been found between dominant and submissive animals. However, it is still unclear whether these differences arise as a consequence of the rewarding nature of the acquisition of a dominant rank, or whether they preexist and favor dominance by promoting reward-seeking behavior. Given that acquisition of a social rank determines animals’ priority access to resources, we hypothesized that differences in reward-seeking behavior might affect hierarchy establishment and that modulation of the dopaminergic system could affect the outcome of a social competition. We characterized reward-seeking behaviors based on rats’ latency to get a palatable-reward when given temporary access to it. Subsequently, rats exhibiting short (SL) and long (LL) latency to get the rewards cohabitated for more than 2 weeks, in order to establish a stable hierarchy. We found that SL animals exhibited dominant behavior consistently in social competition tests [for palatable-rewards and two water competition tests (WCTs)] after hierarchy was established, indicating that individual latency to rewards predicted dominance. Moreover, because SL animals showed higher mesolimbic levels of DA than LL rats, we tested whether stimulation of mesolimbic DA neurons could affect the outcome of a social competition. Indeed, a combination of optical stimulation of mesolimbic DA neurons during individual training and during a social competition test for palatable rewards resulted in improved performance on this test.

Highlights

  • Social inequalities derived from hierarchy establishment have an important impact on individual’s health (Hoebel et al, 2017); in despotic hierarchies most subordinate individuals exhibit a higher prevalence of health problems such as basal hypertension, pathogenic cholesterol profile and increased vulnerability to the atherogenic effects of high-fat diet (Sapolsky, 2005)

  • Single-housed, rats were exposed to five training days and classified according to their average latency to obtain a palatable-reward during the last day of individual training, as animals with either short latency (SL; latency below 2.25 s) or long latency to reward (LL; latency above 5 s; Figure 1B)

  • Our results are in line with previous studies showing that dominant rats present higher reward-seeking behaviors (Davis et al, 2009) and recent human studies indicating that high reward-seeking improves performance of a competitive task (Balconi and Vanutelli, 2016)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Social inequalities derived from hierarchy establishment have an important impact on individual’s health (Hoebel et al, 2017); in despotic hierarchies most subordinate individuals exhibit a higher prevalence of health problems such as basal hypertension, pathogenic cholesterol profile and increased vulnerability to the atherogenic effects of high-fat diet (Sapolsky, 2005). Despite the societal and health implications of social status (Sapolsky, 2005; Wilkinson and Pickett, 2006), very little is known about the factors that contribute to the determination of social dominance rank. Genetic (van der Kooij and Sandi, 2015) and environmental factors, such as exposure to stressors (Cordero and Sandi, 2007), are known to contribute to the determination of social dominance rank and aggressive behaviors, behavioral dimensions such as individual differences in trait anxiety or motivational processes have been hypothesized to play a key mediating role (van der Kooij and Sandi, 2015). Recent work has emphasized the involvement of trait anxiety in defining social competitiveness in both rodents (Hollis et al, 2015; Larrieu et al, 2017) and humans (Goette et al, 2015). High-dominance individuals have been shown to be faster in decision-making, both in competitive and non-competitive settings, suggesting a general cognitive pattern related to dominance trait (Santamaría-García et al, 2013, 2015; da Cruz et al, 2018)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call