Abstract

Introduction: Hospital readmission and mortality following severe exacerbations of COPD requiring acute non-invasive ventilation (NIV) remain high. We hypothesised that HMV and HOT, following cessation of acute NIV, would be superior to HOT alone. Method: An open labelled parallel randomised controlled trial comparing HMV and HOT with HOT alone was performed. The primary outcome was 1-year admission free survival. Patients with persistent hypercapnia (PaCO 2 >7kPa) 2-4 weeks after resolution of respiratory acidosis were recruited. Minimisation was based on BMI, previous use of LTOT, exacerbation frequency and recruiting centre. Patients with BMI >35 kg/m 2 or OSA syndrome were excluded. Results: 116 patients were recruited (67.0±9.6 years, 53% female, BMI 21.6 (18.2-26.1)kg/m 2 , FEV 1 0.6±0.2L and PaCO 2 (7.9±0.9kPa). 59 patients were allocated to HOT (1.0 (0.5-2)Lpm) and 57 to HOT-HMV (O 2 1.0 (0.5-1.5)Lpm) with an IPAP 24 (22-26)cmH 2 O, EPAP 4 (4-5)cmH 2 O and back up rate 14 (14-16)bpm. Median admission free survival was 4.3 months in the HOT-HMV group and 1.4 months in the HOT group; unadjusted HR 0.54 (0.34-0.84); p=0.007, adjusted HR 0.49 (0.31-0.77); p=0.002. Conclusion: Although prognosis is poor in patients with persistent hypercapnia post exacerbation of COPD, the addition of HMV to HOT improved admission free survival.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call