Abstract
Optimal management for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who arrive at a hospital late remains uncertain since evidence and real-world data are limited. Patients who present late with a STEMI are a heterogeneous population, and the clinical decision regarding percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) should not be the same for all. One randomized clinical trial, multiple mechanistic studies, and contemporary registries suggest a presumed benefit for a prompt restoration of coronary flow even in late presenting STEMI. Crucial elements in decision-making are the presence of haemodynamic or electrical instability, and ongoing ischaemic signs or symptoms to tip the scales toward PCI. Among clinically stable, late-presenting patients, myocardial viability assessment and functional testing can identify yet another subgroup that may benefit from late PCI
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
