Abstract

Despite large gradients at rest and exercise across the Model 6300 Starr-Edwards valve, patients in whom it has been inserted have generally had an improvement in functional class and a decrease in heart size; in addition, the heart usually has been successfully maintained in sinus rhythm. The clinical improvement observed in patients with mitral stenosis most probably is a result of an increase in orifice area to above the critically obstructive range, producing a rise in cardiac output. In patients with mitral insufficiency a relatively competent valve is provided; this also may engender an increase in cardiac output. Nevertheless, the calculated orifice area of this prosthetic valve indicates that it may produce a moderate-to-severe degree of obstruction to blood flow. Therefore, in significantly symptomatic patients, replacement of this less than ideal prosthesis should be considered.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call