Abstract

Contrastive analysis has been widely employed in the search for the electrophysiological neural correlates of consciousness. However, despite its clear logic, it has been argued that it may not succeed in isolating neural processes solely involved in the emergence of perceptual awareness. In fact, data from contrastive analysis would be contaminated by potential confounding factors reflecting distinct, though related, processes either preceding or following the conscious perception. At present, the ERP components representing the proper correlates of perceptual awareness still remain to be identified among those correlating with awareness (i.e., Visual Awareness Negativity, VAN and Late Positivity, LP). In order to dissociate visual awareness from post-perceptual confounds specifically related to decision making, we manipulated the response criterion, which affects how a percept is translated into a decision. In particular, while performing an orientation discrimination task, participants were asked to shift their response criterion across sessions. As a consequence, the resulting modulation should concern the ERP component(s) not exclusively reflecting mechanisms regulating the subjective conscious experience itself but rather the processes accompanying it. Electrophysiological results showed that N1 and P3 were sensitive to the response criterion adopted by participants. Additionally, the more the participants shifted their response criterion, the bigger the ERP modulation was; this was consequently indicative of the critical role of these components in the decision-making processes regardless of awareness level. When considering data independently from the response criterion, the aware vs. unaware contrast showed that both VAN and LP were significant. Crucially, the LP component was also modulated by the interaction of awareness and response criterion, while VAN results to be unaffected. In agreement with previous literature, these findings provide evidence supporting the hypothesis that VAN tracks the emergence of visual awareness by encoding the conscious percept, whereas LP reflects the contribution from post-perceptual processes related to response requirements. This excludes a direct functional role of this later component in giving rise to perceptual awareness.

Highlights

  • Neural correlates of consciousness, according to an accepted operationalization, are defined as the minimal subset of neural activations sufficient to trigger a conscious experience (Chalmers, 2000; Crick and Koch, 2003; Fink, 2016)

  • A considerable amount of EEG studies devoted to disclosing the temporal dimension of NCCs has identified two possible candidates for electrophysiological markers of perceptual conscious experience: the Visual Awareness Negativity (VAN), occurring at occipito-temporal sites in the N2 latency range, and the Late Positivity (LP), which is maximally distributed over centro-parietal sites in the P3 time window

  • Consistent with previous studies (e.g., Koivisto and Revonsuo, 2010), a significant main effect of Awareness was found for VAN and LP, respectively, in the 204–224 time window and in the 328–676 time window

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Neural correlates of consciousness (hereafter called NCCs), according to an accepted operationalization, are defined as the minimal subset of neural activations sufficient to trigger a conscious experience (Chalmers, 2000; Crick and Koch, 2003; Fink, 2016). A considerable amount of EEG studies devoted to disclosing the temporal dimension of NCCs has identified two possible candidates for electrophysiological markers of perceptual conscious experience: the Visual Awareness Negativity (VAN), occurring at occipito-temporal sites in the N2 latency range, and the Late Positivity (LP), which is maximally distributed over centro-parietal sites in the P3 time window (at about 300–500 ms after the stimulus onset; Koivisto and Revonsuo, 2003, 2010) These components, though opposite in polarity, are both characterized by a greater amplitude for aware than unaware condition and for this reason are computed as difference waves of the N2 and P3 components. Different cognitive mechanisms have been ascribed to this component family, and its generator is still a matter of extensive debate (Polich, 2007; Volpe et al, 2007; Verleger, 2020)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call