Abstract

Background We examined factors associated with persistent or recurrent congestive heart failure after aortic valve replacement. Methods Patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with contemporary prostheses (n = 1563) were followed up with annual clinical assessment and echocardiography. The effect of demographic, comorbid, and valve-related variables on the composite outcome of New York Heart Association class III or IV symptoms or congestive heart failure death after surgery was evaluated with stratified log-rank tests, Cox proportional hazard models, and logistic regression. Factors associated with all-cause death were also examined. Prediction models were bootstrapped 1000 times. Results Total follow-up was 6768 patient-years (mean, 4.3 ± 3.3 years; range, 60 days to 17.1 years). Freedom from congestive heart failure or congestive heart failure death was 98.6% ± 0.3%, 88.6% ± 1.0%, 73.9% ± 2.3%, and 45.2% ± 8.5% at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Age, preoperative New York Heart Association class, left ventricular grade, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, smoking, and redo status predicted congestive heart failure after surgery (all P < .05). Larger prosthesis size and effective orifice area, both absolute and indexed for body surface area, were independently associated with freedom from congestive heart failure. Increased transprosthesis gradients were predicted by prosthesis-patient mismatch and were associated with congestive heart failure after surgery. Mismatch defined as an effective orifice area/body surface area of 0.80 cm 2/m 2 or less was a significant predictor of congestive heart failure events after surgery, but mismatch defined as an effective orifice area/body surface area of 0.85 cm 2/m 2 or less was not. Small prosthesis size and mismatch were not significantly associated with all-cause mortality. Conclusions These analyses identify independent predictors of congestive heart failure symptoms and congestive heart failure death late after aortic valve replacement and indicate that prosthesis size has a significant effect on this cardiac end point, but not on overall survival after aortic valve replacement.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.