Abstract
This essay addresses longstanding critical disappointment surrounding Falstaff in The Merry Wives of Windsor, which it argues reflects the play's own concerns with the seductions of memory and the claims of the new. It explores contemporary understandings of mirth, suggesting that Merry Wives juxtaposes the carnivalesque Sir John with Windsor's confident citizenry to work through nostalgia for “Merry England” in the Elizabethan present. At the same time, as an early citizen play The Merry Wives of Windsor explores the aesthetic as well as the political implications of old mirth. Falstaff focuses these concerns, embodying not only past carnival but also theatrical history: in particular, he himself is a survivor of an earlier comic present and is usually seen in the light of this remembered glory. Critical discontent has often focused on the apparent inconsistency between early and late Falstaff, but the article argues against this tradition. Drawing on Theodor Adorno's work on late style, it suggests that not only is Falstaff consistent with his earlier incarnations, but his appearance in Merry Wives consciously meditates on the aesthetics of lateness and theatrical disappointment.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.