Abstract
Background Laser hemorrhoidoplasty is a relatively new management option for symptomatic hemorrhoids. Although its advantages over the Milligan–Morgan approach were highlighted in previous trials, the combination of laser and mucopexy (hemorrhoidal artery ligation) is scarcely discussed in the literature. Herein, the author compared the outcomes of the previous combination with the traditional Milligan–Morgan procedure in cases with second and third-degree piles. Methods The 66 included patients were randomly divided into two groups; group A underwent the combined approach, while group B underwent the Milligan–Morgan procedure. Postoperative pain, satisfaction, and complications were assessed. Results Preoperative data, including patient presentation and the degree of piles, were comparable between the two groups. Nonetheless, operative time and hospitalization period showed a significant increase in group B (P = 0.004 and < 0.001). Group A patients expressed significantly lower pain scores during rest and defection, as well as a better satisfaction level, compared with group B patients. The incidence of postoperative complication did not differ between the two interventions, except for urine retention, which was more frequently encountered in group B cases. An earlier return to normal daily activities was noted in group A. 1-month Wexner scores did not differ between the two groups, and no cases developed recurrence during the 1-year follow-up. Conclusion The combination of laser with hemorrhoidal artery ligation is associated with multiple advantages over surgical hemorroidectomy manifested in a better analgesic profile, better satisfaction, and an early restoration to daily activities.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.