Abstract
Latin American political science has experienced a wrong-driven debate on its theoretical approaches and its methodological strategies. This article aims to participate of that debate arguing that regional comparative politics is negatively affected by it due to some wrong assumptions on about relevance, methods and presence in the political science field. It empirically addresses the most important dimensions of comparative politics in the region (with emphasis on the Argentinian case) to refute the argument that suggest its predominance and hegemonic position in Latin American political science field.
Highlights
Latin American political science has experienced a wrong-driven debate on its theoretical approaches
This article aims to participate of that debate arguing that regional comparative politics is negatively affected by
Allí Sartori sigue manteniendo sus posiciones históricas (ver, por ejemplo, Sartori, 1984) a favor de una ciencia política como disciplina autónoma, con un lenguaje especializado, con
Summary
Latin American political science has experienced a wrong-driven debate on its theoretical approaches and its methodological strategies. [REVISTA DEBATES, Porto Alegre, v.7, n.3, p.89-110, set.-dez. Introducción El desarrollo de la ciencia política en América Latina es dispar y heterogéneo.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
