Abstract

Based on the similarity theory, a large-scale shaking table test of a shallow double-arch tunnel under unsymmetrical pressure with a similarity ratio of 1 : 20 was designed and completed, and a foam concrete damping layer was set in the double-arch tunnel. The acceleration response, strain response, and crack distribution of double-arch tunnels under different intensities and different directions of the Wenchuan wave excitation were studied (WC-X, WC-Z, and WC-XZ). The results showed that (1) the bias side (right hole) is greatly affected by the unevenness of the cover soil, and the horizontal acceleration response difference between the two tunnels is large and there is no symmetry. The incident direction of seismic waves has a great influence on the acceleration response of double-arch tunnels. The amplification factor of WC-Z is greater than that of WC-X. (2) On the same horizontal plane, with the vertical centerline of the middle wall as the axis of symmetry, the vertical acceleration amplification factor also has a large difference between the arch foot and the shoulder, but the difference is relatively small at other points. (3) The dynamic strain increases with the increase of seismic intensity, and the tendency is similar under the three different seismic wave excitation directions. The lining is under tensile strain and compressive strain, the strain of the left hole is greater than the strain of the right hole, and severe stress concentration occurs at the top left of the mid partition. (4) The middle partition, shoulder, and vault of the left hole and the shoulder, vault, and foot of the right hole are weak parts of earthquake resistance. Therefore, special attention should be paid to the seismic design.

Highlights

  • In recent years, tunnel engineering has developed from small spans and small spaces to large spans and large spaces, and the types of structures have become more complicated

  • Many scholars have used numerical simulation methods to study the dynamic response of doublearch tunnels. rough the numerical analysis of the finite element model, the weakest part of the seismic performance of the double-arch tunnel was obtained [1]

  • Ling [3] found that the invert, arch foot and spandrel of the double-arch tunnel are the weak link of earthquake resistance through numerical analysis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tunnel engineering has developed from small spans and small spaces to large spans and large spaces, and the types of structures have become more complicated. Erefore, studying the dynamic response characteristics of double-arch tunnels during earthquakes has become a problem that must be faced in current engineering construction. Zhenchang et al [11] studied the seismic dynamic response of large section tunnel under shallow cover and unsymmetrical loading through the shaking table test and found out the influencing factors of the dynamic stress peak and the crack development characteristics of the lining structure. Ping et al [14, 15] concluded that the installation of the damping layer can reduce the internal force peak of the lining under the earthquake load and improve the seismic performance of the single-hole tunnel through the shaking table test. According to the research status of seismic resistance and shock absorption of double-arch tunnels, based on the effective method of shaking table test, the author uses the foam concrete damping layer to reduce the dynamic response of the tunnel. A physical model of the doublearch tunnel with a geometric similarity ratio of 1 : 20 was designed and fabricated, and the shaking table test was carried out. e acceleration and strain response of the shallow double-arch tunnel under unsymmetrical pressure are studied when different seismic wave excitation intensities and different excitation directions are input. e research results can provide a useful reference for the seismic design of double-arch tunnels

Shanking Table Test
Analysis of Test Results
A12 A11
A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 A11 A12 Monitoring points
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call