Abstract

Measuring whole-brain functional connectivity patterns based on task-free (‘resting-state’) spontaneous fluctuations in the functional MRI (fMRI) signal is a standard approach to probing habitual brain states, independent of task-specific context. This view is supported by spatial correspondence between task- and rest-derived connectivity networks. Yet, it remains unclear whether intrinsic connectivity observed in a resting-state acquisition is persistent during task. Here, we sought to determine how changes in ongoing brain activation, elicited by task performance, impact the integrity of whole-brain functional connectivity patterns (commonly termed ‘resting state networks’). We employed a ‘steady-states’ paradigm, in which participants continuously executed a specific task (without baseline periods). Participants underwent separate task-based (visual, motor and visuomotor) or task-free (resting) steady-state scans, each performed over a 5-minute period. This unique design allowed us to apply a set of traditional resting-state analyses to various task-states. In addition, a classical fMRI block-design was employed to identify individualized brain activation patterns for each task, allowing us to characterize how differing activation patterns across the steady-states impact whole-brain intrinsic connectivity patterns. By examining correlations across segregated brain regions (nodes) and the whole brain (using independent component analysis) using standard resting-state functional connectivity (FC) analysis, we show that the whole-brain network architecture characteristic of the resting-state is comparable across different steady-task states, despite striking inter-task changes in brain activation (signal amplitude). Changes in functional connectivity were detected locally, within the active networks. But to identify these local changes, the contributions of different FC networks to the global intrinsic connectivity pattern had to be isolated. Together, we show that intrinsic connectivity underlying the canonical resting-state networks is relatively stable even when participants are engaged in different tasks and is not limited to the resting-state.

Highlights

  • Functional connectivity (FC) is a powerful and widely used tool for probing brain network organization and function in healthy [1,2,3,4,5] and clinical populations [6,7,8,9,10,11]

  • We focus our analysis on four steady-state conditions, collected either during rest or during three continuous tasks, allowing us to make inferences about resting and task-derived FC patterns based on the entire scan, rather than on brief rest and task periods used in traditional block designs

  • We investigated the effects of regional brain activation on FC, by comparing resting-state to steady-state task FC measurements

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Functional connectivity (FC) is a powerful and widely used tool for probing brain network organization and function in healthy [1,2,3,4,5] and clinical populations [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Intrinsic FC is suggested to reflect the habitual state of the brain, independent of the specific context. Many new studies, such as those employing psychophysiological interactions (PPI) [25], emphasize the differences in FC patterns resulting from dynamic changes in task demands [26,27,28,29,30]. These divergent observations raise the question of whether FC, as measured using fMRI, is sensitive to changes in brain activation. Does intrinsic FC reflect the canonical (default, activation-independent), or current (transient, activation-dependent) state of the brain?

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.