Abstract
Conflicts over natural resources are often misunderstood as being driven primarily by economic concerns or failings of human nature. However, human dimensions research has shown that conflicts are more often driven by problems and shortcomings in institutions for governance and management. In this article, we explore long-standing conflicts over the salmon fisheries of the Kenai River and Upper Cook Inlet region of Southcentral Alaska, fisheries that are embroiled in a long-standing conflict and controversy. We engaged in ethnographic research with participants from commercial, sport, and personal use fisheries in the region to understand their perceptions of these local “salmon wars.” We find that these disputes are more nuanced than is captured by existing typologies of natural resource conflicts, and argue that conflicts can take on a life of their own wherein people stop responding to each other and start responding to the conflict itself, or at least the conflict as they understand it. This perspective is helpful for understanding how conflict in the region has escalated to a point of apparent dysfunction via a process known as schismogenesis. We conclude with a discussion that considers this conflict as an indicator of institutional failure from a social justice perspective, and argue that attempts for conflict management and/or resolution in cases such as these must focus first on protecting the human rights of all participants.
Highlights
We report on ethnographic research in one of the most hotly contested set of fisheries in Alaska: the salmon fisheries of the Upper Cook Inlet and Kenai River
We argue that attention to schismogenesis, and intergenerational issues, which are common to fisheries conflicts (Acheson, 1981; Miller & Van Maanen, 1979), would make their process more robust in this regard
We have attempted here to highlight the systemic nature of conflict and explore what this means for conflict management as well as for the management of fisheries and other shared resources
Summary
We report on ethnographic research in one of the most hotly contested set of fisheries in Alaska: the salmon fisheries of the Upper Cook Inlet and Kenai River. These fisheries, which target multiple species of wild Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.), support active commercial fleets, a thriving tourism industry, and contribute to food security for numerous households (Loring, Gerlach, & Harrison, 2012). As McClanahan, Allison, and Cinner (2013) describe them, There are no quantitative data available on the frequency of each type, but all are common and may be ubiquitous in small-scale fisheries in developing countries . . . Struggles for resource control and for the mechanisms of control . . . are found in the everyday acts of resistance by many fisherfolk to central stateimposed management of resources . . . Intra-sectorial conflicts are very frequent—fisheries are diverse industries and conflicts between different user-groups are inevitable. (p. 5)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.