Abstract
The neural processing of others' observed actions recruits a large network of brain regions (the action observation network; AON) in which frontal motor areas are thought to play a crucial role. As the discovery of mirror neurons (MNs) in the ventral premotor cortex, it has been assumed that their activation was conditional upon the presentation of biological rather than nonbiological motion stimuli, supporting a form of direct visuomotor matching. Nonetheless, nonbiological observed movements have rarely been used as control stimuli to evaluate visual specificity, thereby leaving the issue of similarity among neural codes for executed actions and biological or nonbiological observed movements unresolved. Here, we addressed this issue by recording from two nodes of the AON that are attracting increasing interest, namely, the ventrorostral part of the dorsal premotor area F2 and the mesial presupplementary motor area F6 of macaques while they 1) executed a reaching-grasping task, 2) observed an experimenter performing the task, and 3) observed a nonbiological effector moving in the same context. Our findings revealed stronger neuronal responses to the observation of biological than nonbiological movement, but biological and nonbiological visual stimuli produced highly similar neural dynamics and relied on largely shared neural codes, which in turn remarkably differed from those associated with executed actions. These results indicate that, in highly familiar contexts, visuomotor remapping processes in premotor areas hosting MNs are more complex and flexible than predicted by a direct visuomotor matching hypothesis.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Pioneering studies on mirror neurons (MNs) in premotor areas emphasized the absence of response to the sight of nonbiological moving objects, suggesting a match between execution and observation activities. This study shows that although premotor neurons can discriminate between biological and nonbiological observed movements, these visual stimuli rely on largely shared neural codes, which differ strongly from those associated with executed actions.
Highlights
This study shows that premotor neurons can discriminate between biological and nonbiological observed movements, these visual stimuli rely on largely shared neural codes, which differ strongly from those associated with executed actions
Since the pioneering study on mirror neurons (MNs), a class of cells originally discovered in area F5 of the macaque discharging during both action execution and observation, it was reported that “responses to tools or to objects moved in such a way as to imitate the effective action were usually weak or absent altogether” [1]
Subsequent studies have shown that MNs in various nodes of the action observation network (AON) [2] can exhibit visual responses to actions performed with tools [3, 4], actions implied by moving cues [5,6,7,8,9,10], or even withheld actions signaled by an instructive cue [11, 12], suggesting a greater flexibility and broader relationship between the visual and motor codes
Summary
Since the pioneering study on mirror neurons (MNs), a class of cells originally discovered in area F5 of the macaque discharging during both action execution and observation, it was reported that “responses to tools or to objects moved in such a way as to imitate the effective action were usually weak or absent altogether” [1]. These findings emphasized the similarity between the neural codes for observed and executed actions, that is, the visual and motor formats. We recorded from two important nodes of the AON—the ventrorostral part of the dorsal premotor area F2 [15] and the mesial presupplementary motor area F6 [16]—under two main alternative hypotheses: 1) an “action hypothesis” (Fig. 1A), which predicts greater similarity in the representation of “actions,” www.jn.org
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
