Abstract

We present a comparative study of large wood (LW) mobility in two steep channels (0.06<S<0.20) of contrast European landscapes during major hydro-geomorphic events of similar magnitude. We investigated a headwater perennial stream draining Central European medium-high mountain relief (the Klepáčský, Hrubý Jeseník Mts, Czech Republic; A≤2.5 km2) and an ephemeral Mediterranean steep stream (the Sfakiano Gorge, Crete, Greece; A≤52 km2). Both studied hydro-geomorphic events were partially accompanied by debris-flood or debris-flow character of sediment transport including significant content of LW. The minimal estimations of transported LW volume were 71.3 m3 along 1.7 km long reach in the Klepáčský and 49.4 m3 along 4 km long reach in the Sfakiano Gorge. Despite completely different characters of hydrologic regimes, riparian zones and valley confinement settings, living trees in the valley floor played crucial role in wood deposition and development of large jams in both environments. The trees living in the valley floor were the main source of LW in the studied Mediterranean channel, whereas long-term LW recruitment from very steep hillslopes or rock cliffs was quite negligible. On the other hand, previous windstorms in the Klepáčsky caused notable delivery of LW from adjacent hillslopes and LW recruitment by bank erosion occurred only at spatially-limited semi-confined parts of the valley.

Highlights

  • Large wood (LW) is an important geomorphic and ecological component of the fluvial landscape, including steep mountain channels

  • These differences in LW abundance can be directly related to the different character of tree stands growing in the valley floor and at adjacent hillslopes as well as to specific recruitment processes at both sites

  • The upper part of the Klepáčský was affected by preceding windstorms, which delivered a high number of LW pieces into the channel from adjacent hillslopes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Large wood (LW) is an important geomorphic and ecological component of the fluvial landscape, including steep mountain channels (here defined as S>0.04 m/m). Fluvial transport of instream wood is mostly dependent upon ratios between LW length and channel width and between LW diameter and flow depth [4, 5]. LW is assumed to be transport-limited by ordinary flows when compared to wider lowland rivers [6, 7].

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call