Large Vessel Occlusion Sites Affect Agreement Between Outputs of Three Computed Tomography Perfusion Software Packages

Abstract

ObjectivesComputed tomography perfusion (CTP) data are important for hyperacute stroke decision making. Available comparisons between outputs of different CTP software packages show variable outcomes. Evaluation for factors associated with agreement between the volume estimates is limited. We assessed for differences in core and penumbra volume estimates of three CTP software packages – AutoMIStar, RAPID, and Vitrea – and analyzed factors associated with agreement between the volume estimates. Materials and MethodsDifferences between software estimates of penumbra and core volumes were calculated for each patient with suspected acute ischemic stroke who underwent CTP. Exploratory hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis were performed to identify factors of decreased volume estimate agreement. Two-sample t-tests were performed, stratified by large vessel occlusion (LVO) location. Results579 CTP studies were performed; 267 were normal, 139 artifacts, with 172 included in the final analysis. 79/172 had LVO of internal carotid artery (ICA, n = 20), M1 (n = 38) and proximal M2 (n = 21). LVO was the only factor associated with decreased software package agreement, and proximal LVO location was associated with general trend of increasing mean differences and standard deviations between software packages (range of mean differences [SD]: non-LVO, -17–6 [4–33] ml; M2, -40–13 [5–39] ml; M1, -43–26 [16–58] ml; ICA, -76–39 [22–97] ml). ConclusionsCore and penumbra volume estimates can be affected by LVO location significantly between CTP software packages.