Abstract

The interior-point algorithms can be classified in multiple ways. One of these takes into consideration the length of the step. In this way, we can speak about large-step and short-step methods, that work in different neighbourhoods of the central path. The large-step algorithms work in a wide neighbourhood, while the short-step ones determine the new iterates that are in a smaller neighbourhood. In spite of the fact that the large-step algorithms are more efficient in practice, the theoretical complexity of the short-step ones is generally better. Ai and Zhang introduced a large-step interior-point method for linear complementarity problems using a wide neighbourhood of the central path, which has the same complexity as the best short-step methods. We present a new wide neighbourhood of the central path. We prove that the obtained large-step primal–dual interior-point method for linear programming has the same complexity as the best short-step algorithms.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call