Abstract
The flow routing module in several large-scale erosion and sediment transport models generally adopts simplifications that ignore important physical aspects of river dynamics. In this study we compare for the first time the results generated by a large-scale erosion and sediment transport model, using two different flow routing approaches: a combined Saint-Venant and Muskingum-Cunge method and the Inertial flow routing. For this assessment, simulations are performed with the MGB-SED model. We evaluate sediment characteristics such as suspended sediment load and concentration, floodplain effects, and the flux of suspended sediment within the Madeira River basin. The simulation with the inertial approach presents satisfactory results, similar to those achieved with the combined Saint-Venant approach for lowland rivers and the Muskingum-Cunge method for steeper rivers. Also, Inertial module is capable to represent the complex processes of the basin, but with easier preprocessing and numerical features, thus promising expanded capabilities for large-scale simulations.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
