Abstract

To develop and validate a protein risk score for predicting chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with diabetes and compare its predictive performance with a validated clinical risk model (CKD Prediction Consortium [CKD-PC]) and CKD polygenic risk score. This cohort study included 2,094 patients with diabetes who had proteomics and genetic information and no history of CKD at baseline from the UK Biobank Pharma Proteomics Project. Based on nearly 3,000 plasma proteins, a CKD protein risk score including 11 proteins was constructed in the training set (including 1,047 participants; 117 CKD events). The median follow-up duration was 12.1 years. In the test set (including 1,047 participants; 112 CKD events), the CKD protein risk score was positively associated with incident CKD (per SD increment; hazard ratio 1.78; 95% CI 1.44, 2.20). Compared with the basic model (age + sex + race, C-index, 0.627; 95% CI 0.578, 0.675), the CKD protein risk score (C-index increase 0.122; 95% CI 0.071, 0.177), and the CKD-PC risk factors (C-index increase 0.175; 95% CI 0.126, 0.217) significantly improved the prediction performance of incident CKD, but the CKD polygenic risk score (C-index increase 0.007; 95% CI -0.016, 0.025) had no significant improvement. Adding the CKD protein risk score into the CKD-PC risk factors had the largest C-index of 0.825 (C-index from 0.802 to 0.825; difference 0.023; 95% CI 0.006, 0.044), and significantly improved the continuous 10-year net reclassification (0.199; 95% CI 0.059, 0.299) and 10-year integrated discrimination index (0.041; 95% CI 0.007, 0.083). Adding the CKD protein risk score to a validated clinical risk model significantly improved the discrimination and reclassification of CKD risk in patients with diabetes.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.